McClennaham v. Houser et al
| James McClennaham |
| Earl Houser, State of Alaska - Dept. of Corrections, Bauer, Washington, Wallace, Peterson, M. Rhodes, B. Dresner and M. Machalski |
| 3:2022cv00203 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Joshua M Kindred |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Prisoner's Application to Waive Prepayment of the Filing Fee by James McClennaham. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(LMH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 4
ORDER RE: DEFICIENT FILING: re #1 Complaint filed by James McClennaham. Signed by Judge Joshua M. Kindred on 9/26/22. (LMH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant Peterson, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant Michael Rhodes, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant Ben Dresner, #3 Unissued Summons re Defendant Bauer, #4 Unissued Summons re Defendant Washington, #5 Unissued Summons re Defendant Wallace, #6 Unissued Summons re Defendant Matthew Machalski)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bauer, B. Dresner, Earl Houser, M. Machalski, Peterson, M. Rhodes, State of Alaska - Dept. of Corrections, Wallace, Washington, filed by James McClennaham.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
