Williams v. Reichl et al
Plaintiff: Samuel Williams
Defendant: Daylon Reichl and Pittman IMP, LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv00025
Filed: February 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Alaska
Presiding Judge: Joshua M Kindred
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING AND PLANNING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/1/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 4/1/2024. For details see Order. Signed by Judge Joshua M. Kindred on 3/14/2023. (SCD, COURT STAFF)
March 1, 2023 Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Barber, Jeffrey)
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE INITIAL SCHEDULING & PLANNING CONFERENCE REPORT: Counsel for plaintiff shall serve and file the Rule 26 Meeting Report within 21 days of service of this order. Signed by Judge Joshua M. Kindred on 2/9/23. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
February 9, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF LODGING STATE COURT DOCUMENT(S) by All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X, #25 Exhibit Y)(Nolan, James)
February 9, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING STATE COURT SERVICE LIST by All Defendants (Nolan, James)
February 9, 2023 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Pittman IMP, LLC, Daylon Reichl. (Nolan, James)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to Petitioner Subsequent to Removal: Service list due within 10 days. State Court documents due within 20 days. (LMH, COURT STAFF)
February 3, 2023 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Pittman IMP, LLC, Daylon Reichl. (LMH, COURT STAFF)
February 3, 2023 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet (LMH, COURT STAFF)
February 3, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Daylon Reichl, Pittman IMP, LLC from State of Alaska, Third Judicial District Anchorage, case number 3AN-21-8276 CI. ( Filing fee $ 402 - Receipt #100019838 ), filed by Daylon Reichl, Pittman IMP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(LMH, COURT STAFF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Reichl et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Williams
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daylon Reichl
Represented By: James S. Nolan
Represented By: James Samuel Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pittman IMP, LLC
Represented By: James S. Nolan
Represented By: James Samuel Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?