State of Alaska v. National Marine Fisheries Service
| State of Alaska |
| National Marine Fisheries Service |
| 3:2023cv00032 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Clarification of Service Date (Unopposed) re #8 Affidavit of Service, by National Marine Fisheries Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cevallos, Astrid) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Civil Cover Sheet, Summons in A Civil Action, Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief served on S. Lane Tucker, National Marine Fisheries Service, Merrick B. Garland on 2/16/2023, filed by State of Alaska. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Opsahl, Ronald) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE re #5 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Tyler Carlton, at docket #5 , is authorized under L.Civ.R. 83.1(d). (RMC, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE re #4 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Norman D. James, at docket #4 , is authorized under L.Civ.R. 83.1(d). (RMC, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Tyler Carlton. ( Pro Hac Vice Admission fee $250.00 paid. Receipt number AAKDC-3407594.) by State of Alaska.(James, Norman) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Norm James. ( Pro Hac Vice Admission fee $250.00 paid. Receipt number AAKDC-3407580.) by State of Alaska.(James, Norman) |
| Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant National Marine Fisheries Service, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney General)(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Opsahl, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against State of Alaska ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AAKDC-3394209.), filed by State of Alaska.(Opsahl, Ronald) |
| Summons Issued as to National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: State of Alaska v. National Marine Fisheries Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: State of Alaska | |
| Represented By: | Norman D. James |
| Represented By: | Ronald Walter Opsahl |
| Represented By: | Tyler Carlton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service | |
| Represented By: | Astrid Stuth Cevallos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
