Niedermeyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Matthew Niedermeyer |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 3:2023cv00226 |
| September 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| H Russel Holland |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING AND PLANNING ORDER: Discovery due by 8/16/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 12/2/2024. See Order for additional deadlines. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 11/1/2023. (JDS, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Rayburn, Mark) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: The parties' scheduling and planning report is past due. If counsel have not conferred with respect to scheduling, they shall do so forthwith and file their joint scheduling and planning report on or before November 9, 2023. (JDS, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING STATE COURT DOCUMENT(S) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff Jury Demand, #4 Exhibit Defendant's Jury Demand, #5 Exhibit Defendant's Notice of Appearance, #6 Exhibit State Court Notice of Removal)(Graves, Cheryl) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Graves, Cheryl) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE INITIAL SCHEDULING & PLANNING CONFERENCE REPORT: Counsel for plaintiff shall serve and file the Rule 26 Meeting Report within 21 days of service of this order. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 10/6/2023. (JDS, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER to Petitioner Subsequent to Removal: Service list due within 10 days. State Court documents due within 20 days. (SXH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Graves, Cheryl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING STATE COURT SERVICE LIST by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Graves, Cheryl) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Graves, Cheryl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Palmer Superior, case number 3PA-23-02159CI. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AAKDC-3501224), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint)(Graves, Cheryl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Niedermeyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Niedermeyer | |
| Represented By: | Mark D. Rayburn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl L. Graves |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
