Smith v. Municipality of Anchorage et al
| Gregory Smith |
| Municipality of Anchorage, Jessica Willoughby, Dave Bronson, Michael Braniff, Michael Kerle and Kimberly Rash |
| 3:2023cv00257 |
| November 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS: Plaintiff's motion to waive the filing fee at Docket #3 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order at Docket #4 is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for expedited consideration at Docket #5 is GRANTED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 11/9/2023. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 11/9/2023. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Expedite Consideration by Gregory Smith.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Gregory Smith.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gregory Smith.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Braniff, Dave Bronson, Michael Kerle, Municipality of Anchorage, Kimberly Rash, Jessica Willoughby, filed by Gregory Smith.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
