MacDonald v. Haaland et al
| Theresa Margaret MacDonald |
| Debra Haaland, Darryl LaCounte and Melanie Bahnke |
| 3:2023cv00291 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Kyle F Reardon |
| Kyle F Reardon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 25 U.S.C. ยง 1901 Indian Child Welfare Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SCREENING ORDER re #1 Complaint: This action is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by March 25, 2024. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Kyle F Reardon on 1/25/2024. (ELH, CHAMBERS STAFF)
|
| Filing 4 SLG TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to D.Ak.LMR2, the above-referenced case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Kyle F. Reardon for all pretrial proceedings and dispositive recommendations. (RMC, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Theresa Margaret MacDonald.(BJK, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Melanie Bahnke, Debra Haaland and Darryl LaCounte, filed by Theresa Margaret MacDonald.(BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
