Lewis-Junge v. Lawhorne et al
| Tamisha Lewis-Junge |
| Cyrenthia Lawhorne, Providence Hospital and U.S. Air Force |
| 3:2025cv00222 |
| September 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Ralph R Beistline |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 12/5/2025. (ANM, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SCREENING: The Complaint at Docket #1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 12/5/2025. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/18/2025. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 4 SLG TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: By agreement of the judges, the above referenced case is hereby reassigned to the Honorable Ralph R. Beistline for all further proceedings. Please use the following case number on all future filings: 3:25-cr-00222-RRB. (LMH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tamisha Lewis-Junge. (JDV, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet (JDV, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cyrenthia Lawhorne, Providence Hospital, U.S. Air Force, filed by Tamisha Lewis-Junge.(JDV, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
