James v. Hartz et al
| Michael William James |
| Laura Hartz, Cynthia Percey, Robin Smith, Ruth Meier, Aisha Tinker Bray, Joseph B. Dallaire, Gayle L. Garrigues, Stephen J. Cox, Nancey Dalstrom, Phil McGrane, Pamela Bondi and Marco Rubio |
| 3:2026cv00106 |
| March 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Anchorage Office |
| Aaron Christian Peterson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT Signed by Judge Aaron Christian Peterson on 4/24/2026. (JRF, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SCREENING & NOTICE OF STRIKE: This action is DISMISSED as frivolous. This dismissal counts as a STRIKE. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall unseal this case, issue a final judgment, and close this case. Signed by Judge Aaron Christian Peterson on 4/24/2026. (JRF, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 1 Bill by Complaintant for Declatory Decree for Status Prior to Entering a Petition for Article III (De Novo) Review of a Private Cause of Action Resulting in the Breach of Fiduciary Duties/Trusteeship and Destruction of Private Rights against All Defendants, filed by Michael William James. (Attachments: #1 1, #2 2, #3 3 part 1, #4 3 part 2, #5 3 part 3)(PXS, COURT STAFF) (Main Document 1 replaced to unseal on 4/24/2026) (ANM, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
