Trocin v. Edlow et al
| Ghenadie Trocin |
| Joseph B. Edlow, Mark Wayne Mullin, Danielle Lehman and Ted Kim |
| 3:2026cv00128 |
| March 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Aaron Christian Peterson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Unissued summons re Defendant Joseph B. Edlow, (JDV, COURT STAFF) |
| Summons Issued as to Joseph B. Edlow. (JDV, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Ghenadie Trocin as to All Defendants. (Jacobson, Regina) |
| Filing 3 HRH TEXT ORDER: At the request of Judge Holland, this case is randomly reassigned to another judge. Pursuant to the system of random case assignments, this case is reassigned to the Honorable District Judge Aaron Christian Peterson for all further proceedings. Please use the following case number on all future filings: 3:26-cv-00128-ACP. (JDV, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to the system of random case assignment, this case has been assigned to the Honorable Senior Judge H. Russel Holland. Please use the following case number for all future filings 3:26-cv-00128-HRH. (JDV, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AAKDC-3915076.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jacobson, Regina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.