Marshall v. Berryhill
| Robert Olin Marshall |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 4:2018cv00043 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Alaska |
| H Russel Holland |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due 60 days after Defendant's initial appearance. See Order for additional deadlines. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 2/8/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Olin Marshall. Nancy A. Berryhill served on 2/5/2019, answer due 2/26/2019. (Wicklund, Edward) |
| Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #10 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard L. Pomeroy on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Pomeroy, Richard) |
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT concerning service of the complaint on defendants by Robert Olin Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Wicklund, Edward) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re Notice to Counsel. Plaintiff shall either file proofs of service or a status report concerning service of the complaint on defendants by seven days from this order. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Edward A. Wicklund. ( Pro Hac Vice Admission fee $150.00 paid. Receipt number 097--2629812.) by Robert Olin Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Wicklund, Edward) |
| Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant Nancy Berryhill, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant United States Attorney- Alaska, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant United States Attorney General)(BJK, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill (Filing fee $ 400.00 ANC015282), filed by Robert Olin Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marshall v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Olin Marshall | |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Richard L. Pomeroy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
