McKee-McGraw v. Berryhill
Ms. Yvonne McKee-McGraw |
Nancy Berryhill |
4:2019cv00012 |
April 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Ralph R Beistline |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey E. Staples on behalf of Nancy Berryhill (Staples, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Agency record due within 60 days of the Defendant's initial appearance. See Order for additional deadlines. Signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 5/15/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #9 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard L. Pomeroy on behalf of Nancy Berryhill (Pomeroy, Richard) |
Filing 7 RRB TEXT ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident) Attorney at Docket #4 is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application to appear pro hac vice by Theodore Norwood at Docket 4 is authorized under D. Ak. L.R. 83.1(d). (LLR, CHAMBERS STAFF) |
Filing 6 NOTICE Of Good Standing by Yvonne McKee-McGraw re #1 Complaint, #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Theodore Norwood (Norwood, Theodore) |
Filing 5 Receipt of $150.00 non-resident attorney payment for Theodore Norwood as to plaintiff Yvonne McKee-McGraw. re #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Theodore Norwood (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Theodore Norwood. by Yvonne McKee-McGraw.(BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney General, (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant U.S. Attorney, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant Social Security Administration)(BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy Berryhill (Filing fee $ 400.00 Receipt ANC015668), filed by Yvonne McKee-McGraw.(BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Summons Issued as to Nancy Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McKee-McGraw v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ms. Yvonne McKee-McGraw | |
Represented By: | Theodore Angenendt Norwood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill | |
Represented By: | Richard L. Pomeroy |
Represented By: | Jeffrey E. Staples |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.