Hudson v. Dena' Nena' Henash
Cecilia Lameda Hudson |
Dena' Nena' Henash |
4:2020cv00002 |
January 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
H Russel Holland |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Victor Joseph by Dena' Nena' Henash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, TCC Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, #2 Exhibit B, TCC/IHS Annual Funding Agreement FY 2018 2020, #3 Exhibit C, Alaska Tribal Health Compact)(Monkman, Richard) Modified on 2/27/2020 to create relationship to document #9 (PXS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS by Dena' Nena' Henash #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(1)] filed by Dena' Nena' Henash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Paul Sherry Int'l J Circumpolar Health)(Monkman, Richard) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(1)] by Dena' Nena' Henash.(Monkman, Richard) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion re Motion to Dismiss and Stay of Discovery. Defendant's motion to dismiss shall by filed by 2/28/2020. Discovery is stayed pending ruling on defendant's motion to dismiss. If no motion to dismiss is filed or if the court denies defendant's motion to dismiss, parties shall file their Initial Case Status Report/Case Scheduling and Planning Report within 14 days of the court's decision. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 2/13/20. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Discovery Stay and Regarding Motion to Dismiss by Dena' Nena' Henash.(Monkman, Richard) |
Filing 6 ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS: Advising counsel of the procedure to follow prior to filing a Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge H. Russel Holland on 1/30/20. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE STATUS REPORT/CASE SCHEDULING AND PLANNING ORDER: Counsel for plaintiff shall serve and file the Rule 26 Meeting Report within 21 days of service of this order. (JLH, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING STATE COURT SERVICE LIST by Dena' Nena' Henash (Monkman, Richard) |
Filing 3 ORDER to Petitioner Subsequent to Removal: Service list due within 10 days. State Court documents due within 20 days. (PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (Monkman, Richard) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dena' Nena' Henash from Superior Court for the State of Alaska, case number 4FA-19-02963CI. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 097--2818806), filed by Dena' Nena' Henash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings)(Monkman, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hudson v. Dena' Nena' Henash | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dena' Nena' Henash | |
Represented By: | Richard D. Monkman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cecilia Lameda Hudson | |
Represented By: | Brad S. Kane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.