Hinkle v. O'Malley
| James Hinkle |
| Martin O'Malley |
| 4:2024cv00010 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Kyle F Reardon |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice of Lodging Administrative Record (Attachments: #1 Part 1, #2 Part 2)(Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Franco Luciano Becia on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Assignment to a US Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent form. Re: #1 Complaint filed by James Hinkle. Please Note: Forms must NOT be electronically filed with the Court. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 4/18/2024. (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 5
ORDER RE SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT: Application to Waive File Fee at Docket #3 is GRANTED. The Motion to Appear as Pro Hac Vice at Docket #4 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to refund the $250.00 pro hac vice admission fee paid by attorney Christopher Dellert pursuant to L.Civ.R.83.1(e)(3). Defendant to file Answer/Response/Administrative Record w/in 60 days of the filing of complaint; parties to file their briefs w/in 30 days; reply due w/in 14 days. Signed by Judge Kyle F. Reardon on 3/19/24. (BJK, COURT STAFF)
|
| Docket Annotation: For the purpose of tracking the briefing as ordered at docket #5 , when filing the Opening Brief the attorney shall file the document using the event Motion Miscellaneous Relief and text in the relief being sought. Responsive filings should be filed using the event Response in Opposition to Motion or Response to Motion (Non-Opposition). The reply, if any, shall be filed using the event Reply to Response to Motion. (BJK, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Pro Hac Vice (Non-Resident ) Attorney Christopher Dellert. ( Pro Hac Vice Admission fee $250.00 paid. Receipt number AAKDC-3579657.) by James Hinkle. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Dellert, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs by James Hinkle. (SXH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (SXH, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 Complaint filed by James Hinkle. (SXH, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hinkle v. O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Hinkle | |
| Represented By: | Christopher H. Dellert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Marie Constance Scheperle |
| Represented By: | Franco Luciano Becia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
