Chambers v. Copeland et al
| Marcusazia Chambers and Apollo Knight |
| Jill Copeland and University of Alaska Fairbanks Police Department |
| 4:2025cv00011 |
| March 13, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Sharon L Gleason |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SCREENING ORDER: The Complaint at Docket #1 is DISMISSED. Plaintiff to file either a First Amended Complaint or a Voluntary Dismissal within 60 days. Plaintiff's application to waive prepayment of the filing fee at Docket #3 is incomplete and is therefore DENIED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 7/28/2025. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marcusazia Chambers.(ANM, COURT STAFF) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: The Nature of the Suit is changed to 440 to reflect that this is a Civil Rights Action. This change is administrative in nature only. (ANM, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL RIGHTS CASES FILED BY SELF-REPRESENTED PRISONERS Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 3/13/2025. (ANM, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against Jill Copeland, University of Alaska Fairbanks Police Department, filed by Marcusazia Chambers.(PXS, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.