Fussell, et al. v. Sitnasuak Native Corporation, et al.
| Paul A. Fussell and Larry J. St Clair |
| Sitnasuak Native Corporation, Charles E. Fagerstrom, Charles Ellanna, Oakes, Christopher Rafferty and Does 1-10 |
| 4:2026cv00033 |
| July 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska |
| Aaron Christian Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES FILED BY SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS Signed by Judge Aaron Christian Peterson on 7/24/2026. (JRF, COURT STAFF)
|
| Filing 3 Unissued summons re Defendant Sitnasuak Native Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Unissued Summons re Defendant Charles E. Fagerstrom, #2 Unissued Summons re Defendant Christopher Rafferty, #3 Unissued Summons re Defendant Kelby Oakes)(JRF, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (JRF, COURT STAFF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sitnasuak Native Corporation, Charles E. Fagerstrom, Charles Ellanna, Oakes, Christopher Rafferty, and Does 1-10 filed by Larry J. St Clair, Paul A. Fussell. (Filing fee $ 405 paid/ Receipt# 100002427) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(JRF, COURT STAFF) |
| Summons Issued as to Charles E. Fagerstrom, Oakes, Christopher Rafferty, Sitnasuak Native Corporation. (JRF, COURT STAFF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
