Adamson v. Hayes et al
| Gregory K Adamson |
| Michael Hayes, C Watts, D Dollarhide, J John, M Dobson, C Eastman, C Bridges, R Papke, E Campbell, Unknown Gruetzmacher, Unknown Amezquita, T Miller, Unknown Viso, Unknown Parties, Tempe, City of, Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa, County of |
| 2:2005cv02286 |
| July 29, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John W Sedwick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
253
ORDER AND OPINION ADOPTING AND APPROVING 246 Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting 227 Mr. Adamson's Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, such that Mr. Mayes and Mr. Telles are relieved from their duty to represent Mr. Adamson ; granting Mr. Eisenberg's Motion to Withdraw, such that he is relieved from his responsibility as guardian ad litem for Mr. Adamson. All remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk will enter a judgment that plaintiff take not hing from any of the defendants based on this order and the orders at (Doc. 201) and (Doc. 203) such that all claims are dismissed with prejudice, except that plaintiff's claims in his Second Cause of Action in the Amended Complaint at (Doc. 4) against defendants Michael Hayes, C. Watts, D. Dollarhide, C. Eastman, R. Papke, E. Campbell, Unknown Gruetzmacher, Unknown Amezquita, and T. Miller are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 9/17/12. (LSP)
|
|
Filing
241
ORDER granting 238 Motion to Seal Notice of Filing E-Mails and Exhibits. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 8/16/12. (MAP)
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 188 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court refer this matter to a Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference. Given the age of this case, this court requests that the Magistrate Judge conduct the settlement conference as soon as reasonably convenient to the parties and the Magistrate Judge. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 9/12/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER AND OPINION - For the reasons above, defendants' motion at docket 176 for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Maricopa County and Joseph M. Arpaio are DISMISSED with prejudice. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 7/12/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
197
ORDER granting 193 Motion to Substitute Attorney. S. Lee White is hereby substituted for Maria Brandon and Richard Stewart as the attorney for Defendants Maricopa County and Sheriff Arpaio. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 6/22/11.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that David Eisenberg, Esq., is hereby appointed as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may file dispositive motions on or after, but not before, Friday, March 4, 2011, but not aft er Friday, March 18, 2011 or such dispositive motions will be deemed untimely and summarily denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court and Defendants shall provide electronic notice to David Eisenberg, Esq., Plaintiff's guardian ad litem, on this order and all future filings herein until further order of the Court. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 12/6/10. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
