Cases 1 - 10 of 37
John Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 23-1963
Petitioner:
John C. Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections
John Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 23-1052
Petitioner:
John C. Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections, North Dakota DOCR
John Bridges v. David Krabbenhoft
as 22-3418
Petitioner:
John C. Bridges
Respondent:
David Krabbenhoft, Director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
BRIDGES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv83962
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL C BRIDGES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Bridges v. Leann Bertsch
as 19-1915
Respondent / Appellee:
Leann K. Bertsch, Director, North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner / Appellant:
John C. Bridges, also known as Jesus Christ Beelzebub
John Bridges v. Leann Bertsch
as 19-1582
Petitioner / Appellant:
John C. Bridges, also known as almighty god satan
Respondent / Appellee:
Leann K. Bertsch and Leann K. Bertsch, Director, North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
BRIDGES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv17668
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MARYA C. BRIDGES
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC"), JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges v. Bertsch
as 1:2018cv00266
Respondent:
USA and Leann Bertsch
Petitioner:
John C. Bridges and Almighty God Satan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges v. USA
as 1:2018cv02816
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John C. Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bridges v. Bertsch
as 1:2018cv00219
Respondent:
USA and Leann Bertsch
Petitioner:
John C. Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
