Thomson v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Devika Thomson
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2008cv00919
Filed: May 14, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 11, 2009 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Pla's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; Dft's 20 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. The judgment will serve as the mandate of this Court. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 05/11/09.(ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomson v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devika Thomson
Represented By: R Linda Cosme
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?