Deleon v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Elvira Deleon
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2008cv02372
Filed: December 30, 2008
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 14, 2010 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 23 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/14/2010.(NVO)
February 8, 2010 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Defendant's decision denying benefits is reversed; denying 17 Defendant's Motion to Remand to Social Security Administration and directing the Clerk to remand the case for an award of benefits. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/5/10.(LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deleon v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elvira Deleon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?