Loveless

Plaintiff: Stacey D Loveless
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2009cv00830
Filed: April 20, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 10, 2012 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND OPINION, counsel's Motion/Petition 31 for approval of fees is granted as follows: counsel's fees are approved in the amount of $20,000; Counsel shall refund to plaintiff $4,880.32, the amount of the EAJA award, from the approved $20,000 award. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 4/10/12.(REW)
November 17, 2010 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND OPINION granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees as follows: Defendant shall pay the sum of $4,880.32, reflecting 4 hours of work at the 2009 adjusted statutory maximum of $172.24 and 24 hours of work at the 2010 adjusted statutory maximum of $174.64. Payment shall be made within 30 days of this order. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 11/16/10.(LAD)
July 9, 2010 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - The Commissioner's 20 Motion for Remand to the Social Security Administration is GRANTED. On remand, the new ALJ is directed to: (1) give further consideration to the opinions of Pla's treating physician, Dr. Norman, and examining sources, Dr. Storie and Dr. Van Eerd, pursuant to the provisions of 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527 and Social Security Rulings (SSR) 96-2p and 96-5p, and explain the weight given to such opinion evidence; (2) evaluate the Pla's subjective complaints and provide a rationale in accordance with the disability regulations pertaining to evaluation of symptoms. and, (3) give additional consideration to the claimant's maximum residual functional capacity (RFC) and provide an appropriate rationale with specific references to evidence of record in support of the assessed limitations. and,(4) address Pla's request for additional information from Dr. Van Eerd. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 7/9/10. (SAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loveless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey D Loveless
Represented By: Joel F Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?