Wilkins v. Maricopa County et al
| Brian A Wilkins |
| Maricopa County, Joseph M Arpaio and X-Ray Technician |
| 2:2009cv01380 |
| June 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Lawrence O Anderson |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
ORDER, denying as moot Defendant Maricopa County's 173 Motion to Strike in light of the entry of Judgment in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 6/8/11.(REW)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER granting Defendants Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Darren Dauch's 159 Motion for Summary Judgment; directing the Clerk to terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 6/7/11.(REW)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER, granting Defendant Maricopa County's 156 Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff's claims against Maricopa County are dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 5/27/11.(REW)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 95 Defendant Maricopa County's Motion to Compel. Banner Desert Medical Center; Dr. Alan Walsh; Dr. Gregory Patchen; Walgreens Pharmacy; Medco Health; and A.S.U.s Health Center shall provide complete c opies of Plaintiff's healthcare records, including his mental healthcare records, from June 29, 2004 to June 1, 2010 to counsel for Maricopa County upon service of a subpoena duces tecum and a certified copy of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 101 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions against Maricopa County. See PDF document for deatails. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 6/1/10.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 57 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; it is granted solely to the extent that Darren Dauch is added as a defendant, and the failure-to-train claim asserted in Count Three o f the Second Amended Complaint is added and it is denied as to all other respects. The Clerk shall file 81 Plaintiff's lodged proposed Second Amended Complaint. See PDF document for details. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a service packet for Defendant Darren Dauch. Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of the Court within twenty (20) days of filing of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Darren Dauch shall file his written election to either consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction or elect to proceed before a United States district judge within 14 days of his appearance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 4/6/10.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that Plaintiff's Request for Defendants to Produce Electronically Stored Information and Other Tangible Items, 45 , deemed a motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 1/25/10.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint, the Clerk shall file 29 the proposed First Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counts Two and Three of the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's allegations asserting the rights of detainees other than himself are DISMISSED with prejudice. If Plaintiff fails to prov ide a full name and address for the unknown Jail Guard by February 20, 2010, his claims against unknown Jail Guard may be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 14 Maricopa County's Motion to Dismiss Case; 19 Defe ndant Arpaio's Motion to Dismiss Case; Defendant Arpaio's and Maricopa County's 33 and 35 Motions for Summary Disposition and 38 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Request for Summary Disposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 12/21/09.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
