Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wilkins v. PayPal, Inc.
as 5:2023cv02931
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Wilkins
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Wilkins v. RCI, LLC
as 6:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Wilkins
Defendant:
RCI, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Joyce
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilkins v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services
as 3:2016cv00948
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Wilkins, Sr.
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Children's Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilkins et al v. Humphery County Jail et al
as 3:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Wilkins and Robert C. Pruett
Defendant:
Humphery County Jail and Haley Bradly Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Comcast Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01392
Plaintiff:
Brian A Wilkins
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation, iPacesetters Corporation and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilkins v. Shirleson et al
as 2:2010cv00443
Petitioner:
Brian Allen Wilkins
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilkins v. Maricopa County et al
as 2:2009cv01380
Plaintiff:
Brian A Wilkins
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Joseph M Arpaio and X-Ray Technician
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkins v. Lessard et al
as 2:2009cv00927
Petitioner:
Brian A Wilkins
Respondent:
Steven Lessard and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Maricopa County, et al
as 2:2009cv00754
Plaintiff:
Brian A Wilkins
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Michael Ziemba and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
