Dong v. Kane et al
Petitioner: Chuang Chol Dong
Respondent: Katrina Kane, Janet Napolitano, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and James Kimble
Case Number: 2:2009cv01594
Filed: August 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Lawrence O Anderson
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER AND OPINION RE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 42 - For the reasons above, Magistrate Judge Andersons findings and recommendations are adopted in part and modified in part as described above and as follows: Dongs petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 3/25/11. (LAD)
August 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying without prejudice 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Petitioner's Motion for Joinder of Parties 6 is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion to consolidate. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Summons, Peti tion, and this Order upon the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona by certified mail addressed to the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney. The Clerk of Court also must send by certified mail a copy of the Sum mons, Petition and this Order to the United States Attorney General and to Respondents. Respondents must answer the Petition within 20 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson for further proceedings and areport and recommendation. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 8/13/09.(DMT, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dong v. Kane et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chuang Chol Dong
Represented By: Kara Lee Hartzler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Katrina Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janet Napolitano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Kimble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?