Sanchez-Lopez v. Napolitano, et al.
| Jorge Sanchez-Lopez |
| Janet Napolitano, Chuck DeRosa and Eric Holder |
| 2:2010cv00152 |
| January 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| David G Campbell |
| Mark E Aspey |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER the R&R 12 is accepted. The petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is dismissed with prejudice as moot. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/17/10. (TLJ)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER (Service Packet) - IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's request for a temporary restraining order is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Summons, 1 Petition, and this Order upon the United States Atty for the Dis trict of Arizona addressed to the civil process clerk, to the United States Atty General and to Respondents by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 20 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 20 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/24/10. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
