Dent v. Lynch
Petitioner: Sazar Dent
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2010cv02673
Filed: December 14, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Timothy M. Burgess
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1252 (a)(2) Injunction for Deportation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 206 ORDER granting 180 Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 182 Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/17/17.(KGM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dent v. Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sazar Dent
Represented By: Anne Rachel Traum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Represented By: Walter Manning Evans
Represented By: Cynthia M Parsons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?