Cases 1 - 10 of 413
TUCKER v HOROWITZ et al
as 1:2020cv00117
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID TUCKER
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR, KATHRYN WILBURN DREY, MARIE ARMSTRONG MOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dutschke v. Shartle et al
as 4:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Everett Dutschke
Defendant:
JT Shartle, Jeff Sessions, Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Palm v. Mueller et al
as 2:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Bea Palm
Defendant:
Robert Swan Mueller, III, Barack Hussein Obama, John Owen Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trowbridge, Jr. v. Lew et al
as 4:2016cv02747
Plaintiff:
John Parks Trowbridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Jacob Joseph Lew, Department of Treasury, Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STEWART v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2016cv00682
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ann Stewart
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., Ronald C. Machen, Jr., Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
REED v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv02477
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Reed
Respondent:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., Loretta Lynch and David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv01889
Plaintiff:
Lucio Ortiz-Contreras
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. , Harley Lappin , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv07062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
