Vu v. Holder et al
| Bao Vu |
| Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., Janet A Napolitano, Katrina S Kane and Paul Babeau |
| 2:2011cv00031 |
| January 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Michelle H Burns |
| G Murray Snow |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER - Magistrate Judge Burns' Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is ACCEPTED. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/17/2011. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that the Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Summons, Petition, and this Order upon the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, United States Attorney General and Respondents by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Petiti on within 20 days of the date of service. Respondents must not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Petitioner may file a reply within 20 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 03/03/11. (See attached pdf for complete details) (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
