Fidelity National Financial Incorporated et al v. Friedman et al
| Fidelity National Financial Incorporated and Fidelity Express Network Incorporated |
| Colin H Friedman, Hedy Kramer Friedman, Farid Meshkatai and Anita Kramer Meshkatai |
| Fidelity Express Network Incorporated and Fidelity National Financial Incorporated |
| Farid Meshkatai, Anita Kramer Meshkatai, Colin H Friedman and Hedy Kramer Friedman |
| 2:2011mc00072 |
| July 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER pursuant to the 32 Motion to Withdrawal. ORDERED David M. Bass and Janine F. Cohen of David M. Bass & Associates, Inc. are relieved as counsel of record for Farid and Anita Meshkatai; and Farid Meshkatai and Anita Meshkatai are substituted in on a pro se basis. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 4/17/2014.(LFIG)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER, the Court grants Defendants' motion to vacate the certification of judgment for registration in another district 9 ; the granting of this motion renders moot defendants' secondary argument that because the Washington Registered Judgment "is void for lack of due process and personal jurisdiction, it cannot be the basis for the registration of a new judgment in Arizona". Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 4/9/13. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
