Miller v. Aguillar et al
| William Earl Miller |
| David Aguillar and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2012cv02321 |
| October 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Bridget S Bade |
| Robert C Broomfield |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution 46 is granted; all remaining motions are denied as moot; this action is dismissed without prejudice; the Clerk must enter judgment accordinglyp; for the reasons set forth in this order, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from the judgment in this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/18/14. (REW)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of William Miller. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 4/22/13. (REW)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Court orders pursuant to Rule 41(b). Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 12/20/12. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of William Miller. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 11/21/12. (TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
