LaPointe v. Ryan et al
| Anthony Gregory LaPointe |
| Charles L Ryan, Chris Moody and Tom Horne |
| 2:2015cv01044 |
| June 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Bridget S Bade |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Bade's R&R (Doc. 15 ) is accepted and adopted as the order of this Court. Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 16 ) are overruled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on a ppeal are denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified because reasonable jurists would not find the assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Case Status (Doc. 26 ) and the Motio n for Inquiry and Status of the Case (Doc. 29 ) are denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. (See Order for further details). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/29/2019. (SST)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
