Cases 1 - 10 of 1,074
JUSTUS v. LEVY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
JERETT J JUSTUS
Defendant:
JAILER LEVY COUNTY JAIL, TOM HORNE, COL CHIEF OF STAFF MIKE SHEFFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenna v. United States Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Timothy McKenna
Defendant:
United States Treasury, Tom Horne, Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Ducey et al
as 4:2021cv00122
Defendant:
Tom Horne, Mark Brnovich, Terry Goddard and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sharif Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenna v. Horne et al
as 4:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Tom Horne
Plaintiff:
Timothy McKenna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony LaPointe v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-15976
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS MOODY, Warden of Arizona State Prison Complex - Lewis, CHARLES RYAN, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections and TOM HORNE, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY GREGORY LAPOINTE
Shidan Dahnad v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16085
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHIDAN DAHNAD
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and TOM HORNE
Sorensen et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2017cv00802
Plaintiff:
Charles Sorensen and Stephanie Sorensen
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Tom Horne , Nathaniel Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Larsgard v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-15008
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN KRISTOFFER LARSGARD
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and TOM HORNE
Anthony Camboni v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 16-16645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY CAMBONI
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Assistant U.S. Attorney, SUSAN BRNOVICH, BRIAN BERGIN and others
Coghill v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv00152
Petitioner:
James Prentiss Coghill
Respondent:
Charles Ryan, Tom Horne and Kristin Sunderland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
