Holmes v. Nielson et al
John Charles Holmes |
J Nielson, Unknown Party, G Lowenhagen and Mesa, City of |
2:2017cv03910 |
October 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Eileen S Willett |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's April 26, 2018 Motion to Amend (Doc. 22 ) is DENIED without prejudice; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's May 29, 2018 Motion to Amend (Doc. 30 ) is DENIED without prejudice; and IT IS FINALLY O RDERED that all future filings, including any motion to amend, must be filed in compliance with all Local and Federal Rules, including, but not limited to Local Rules 15.1(a) and 7.1(b). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 1/28/19. (LAD) |
Filing 25 ORDER that Judge Willett's 11 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as the order of this Court. Count III of Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. ORDERED denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 15 M otion to Amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future filings, including any motion to amend, must be filed in compliance with all Local and Federal Rules, including, but not limited to LRCiv. 7.1(b). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/1/2018. (LFIG) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying without prejudice 12 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. FURTHER ORDERED striking the proposed Amended Complaint lodged at (Doc. 13 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 3/14/18. (EJA) |
Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: Order granting 3 Plaintiff's Application for Deferral or Waiver of Court Fees or Costs and Consent to Entry of Judgment. RECOMMENDED that the Court dismiss Count III of Plaintiff's Complaint without leave to amend. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1) should not be filed until entry of the District Court's judgme nt. ORDERED that Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to Counts I and II. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. 1 ), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants City of Mesa, Nielson, and Lowenhagen. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 2/20/18. (EJA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.