Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Aldridge, et al. v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), et al.
as 23-3104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST C. ALDRIDGE
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE M. WILLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE), EIN #52-0883107, ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP, 27-1372364, KRISTA J. NIELSON, Bar #10698 and others
Willis et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Clarence M. Willis and Ernest C. Aldridge
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Aldridge Pite LLP, Laurel I Handley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07738
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06647
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes v. Nielson et al
as 2:2017cv03910
Plaintiff:
John Charles Holmes
Defendant:
J Nielson, Unknown Party, G Lowenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Jefferson County, Colorado, Sheriff's Office
as 1:2016cv01631
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colorado, Sheriff's Office, Thodore (I) Mink, Thodore Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Nielsen, Sr. v. Michael Astrue
as 11-2796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND J. NIELSON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Nielson v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv04647
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Nielson, Sr
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Mary J. Nielson, et al. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-69724
Defendant:
Crown Cork & Seal Co
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Nielson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
