Ochoa v. USA
Petitioner: Armando Pablo Ochoa and Armando Ochoa
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2020cv00647
Filed: March 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michael T Morrissey (PS)
Referring Judge: Susan M Brnovich
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Armando Pablo Ochoa. (SLQ) (6 pages, entered as a Motion to Vacate and Motion to Reopen Case).
April 15, 2020 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in accordance with the Court's Order filed April 15, 2020, movant's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence is denied and the civil action opened in connection is hereby dismissed with prejudice. (SLQ)
April 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) Counsel's April 1, 2020 Motion to Withdraw (Doc. #5 ) is granted. (2) The Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. 66 in CR 18-01169-PHX-SMB) is denied and the civil action opened in connection with this Motion (CV 20-00647-PHX-SMB (MTM)) is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. (3) Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/15/20. (SLQ)
April 1, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Armando Pablo Ochoa. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hilzendeger, Keith)
April 1, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith James Hilzendeger on behalf of Armando Pablo Ochoa. (Hilzendeger, Keith)
March 31, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS)
March 31, 2020 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) by Petitioner Armando Pablo Ochoa. (19 pages) (BAS)
March 31, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) re: Criminal Case No CR18-1169-PHX-SMB filed by Armando Pablo Ochoa. (12 pages) (Attachments: #1 envelope)(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ochoa v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Armando Pablo Ochoa
Represented By: Keith James Hilzendeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Armando Ochoa
Represented By: Keith James Hilzendeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Anthony William Church
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?