Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
August Cabrera, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 23-7076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
August Cabrera, M.G.C., by and through his next friend August Cabrera, R.X.C., by and through his next friend August Cabrera and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
K.E.F.V., by and through her next friend Hortense Vickers
Defendant / Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Ochoa-Aleman v. Garland
as 22-2067
Petitioner:
ARMANDO OCHOA-ALEMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Jose Ochoa-Lopez
as 20-3063
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ARMANDO OCHOA-LOPEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Armando Ochoa v. USA
as 20-16546
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARMANDO PABLO OCHOA, AKA Armando Ochoa
Ochoa v. USA
as 2:2020cv00647
Petitioner:
Armando Pablo Ochoa and Armando Ochoa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CABRERA et al v. BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03833
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA NEWSOM, BRAD JOSEPH HALLIDAY, ANGELA FRITZGES and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, LOUIS BERGER INTERNATIONAL, INC., LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. / BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORPORATION JOINT VENTURE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
CABRERA et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv03835
Plaintiff:
PETER ADAMS, BRAD JOSEPH HALLIDAY, ANGELA FRITZGES and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
United States v. Ochoa-Equihua
as 10-3317
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARMANDO OCHOA-EQUIHUA
Ochoa-Equihua v. USA
as 5:2010cv04034
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Armando Ochoa-Equihua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
