Coffey v. AB Staffing Solutions LLC
Robert Coffey |
AB Staffing Solutions LLC |
2:2020cv01352 |
July 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 9/24/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 505, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J Tuchi. The parties shall submit their joint proposed case management plan not less than seven (7) days before the Scheduling Conference. (See attached Order for additional details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 8/17/2020. (JAMA) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by AB Staffing Solutions LLC.(Samuels, Bruce) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AB Staffing Solutions LLC. (Samuels, Bruce) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Bruce Edward Samuels on behalf of AB Staffing Solutions LLC. (Samuels, Bruce) |
Remark: Out of state attorney Richard J Burch removed as counsel of record for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Carl A Fitz on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Coffey. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Michael A Josephson, Andrew W Dunlap on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Coffey. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Robert Coffey: Return of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Notice, Consent and Order of Reference of Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge upon AB Staffing Solutions LLC on 07/17/2020. (Randall, Samuel) |
Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on October 8, 2020. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/10/2020. (JAMA) |
Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/10/2020. (JAMA) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to AB Staffing Solutions LLC. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18456645. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01352-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Robert Coffey. (submitted by Samuel Randall) (REK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18456645 filed by Robert Coffey.(submitted by Samuel Randall) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.