Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Benally v. Coconino, County of et al
as 3:2024cv08049
Plaintiff:
Renalda Benally
Defendant:
Coconino, County of, Coconino County Jail District, James Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AB Staffing Solutions LLC v. AB Medical Staffing LLC
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
AB Staffing Solutions LLC
Defendant:
AB Medical Staffing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
AB Staffing Solutions, LLC et al v. Asefi Capital, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
AB Staffing Solutions, LLC, Bay Area Anesthesia, LLC d/b/a World Wide Medical, LLC and Bay Area Anesthesia, LLC doing business as World Wide Medical, LLC
Defendant:
Asefi Capital, Inc. d/b/a ACI Federal and Asefi Capital, Inc. doing business as ACI Federal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barton & Associates Incorporated v. Trainor et al
as 2:2020cv01560
Plaintiff:
Barton & Associates Incorporated
Defendant:
Andre Godbout, Kendall Guaglianone, AB Staffing Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wounded Foot Graham v. Alving et al
as 5:2018cv05050
Plaintiff:
Sandra Wounded Foot Graham
Undetermined:
Dr. Alving E. Ralph and Dr. Ralph E. Alving
Defendant:
AB Staffing Solutions, LLC and Amy E. Alving
Estate Plaintiff:
Sherry Wounded Foot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brisbin v. AB Staffing Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01183
Plaintiff:
Kyle Brisbin
Defendant:
AB Staffing Solutions, LLC and Parmjit M. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gomes v. AB Staffing Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02105
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Eugene Gomes
Defendant:
AB Staffing Solutions LLC, Evan Burks, Admiral Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
