McDonald v. HD Supply et al
Michael McDonald |
Unknown Parties and HD Supply |
2:2021cv00737 |
April 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
G Murray Snow |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter of Right to Sue)(Finson, Lowell) |
Filing 9 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the parties' Stipulated Request (Doc. #7 ). Plaintiff shall have an extension to June 18, 2021 in which to file his amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendant an extension to July 9, 2021 in which to file its response to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 06/07/2021. (MHW) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #7 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint filed by Michael McDonald. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. Please do not refile. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SST) |
Filing 7 *STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Michael McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Finson, Lowell) *Modified to reflect Local Rule violation on 6/4/2021 (SST). |
Filing 6 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the parties' Stipulation (Doc. #5 ). Plaintiff shall have an extension to May 21, 2021 in which to file an Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension to June 11, 2021 in which to file its response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 5/17/2021. (LAD) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION | Stipulated Request to Extend Deadline for Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint and Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Second) by HD Supply. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Guner, Lori) |
Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' Stipulated Request (Doc. #3 ). Defendant shall have an extension to May 17, 2021 in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages attached to Defendant's Notice of Removal at Doc. 1-3, pp. 2-11. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 05/03/2021. (MHW) |
Filing 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT | STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) by HD Supply. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Guner, Lori) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-19400268. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-737-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2021-002860. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-19400268 filed by HD Supply. (Uppal, Pavneet) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(ARC) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Arbitration, Amended Civil Cover Sheet upon HD Supply on 3/25/2021. (ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.