Cardenas v. United States of America
| David Aldaba Cardenas |
| United States of America and Bruno Stolc |
| 2:2021cv01383 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court's Order filed September 28, 2021, Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is dismissed and this case is hereby closed. (SMH) |
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) Petitioner's Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. #6 ) is denied, and this case is dismissed. (2) The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 9/27/21. (SMH)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED vacating the Clerk's Judgment entered on September 15, 2021 (Doc. #4 ). The case shall be reopened and the amended petition screened. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 9/20/21. (SMH)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) terminating United States of America filed by David Aldaba Cardenas. (9 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number PHX231836. PAID IN FULL. (BAS) |
| Filing 4 *VACATED per Doc. #7 Order* CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court's Order filed August 11, 2021, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2241 is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (SMH) Modified on 9/20/2021 (SMH). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Petitioner's Motion to Run Federal Sentence Concurrent with State Sentence (Doc. #1 ), which the Court will construe as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, is dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended 2241 petition in compliance with this Order. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In Federal Custody" and the current court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 8/11/21. (SST)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (WLP) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) (document titled "Motion to Run Federal Sentence Concurrent with State Sentence") filed by David Aldaba Cardenas. (2 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(WLP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
