Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Rushing v. Stolc
as 24-2178
Petitioner: THEODORE ROOSEVELT RUSHING
Respondent: BRUNO STOLC
McDaniel v. Warden
as 23-654
Petitioner: TYSON TERRELL MCDANIEL
Respondent: BRUNO STOLC and WARDEN
Palmer v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00500
Plaintiff: Lemuel Harold Palmer, V
Defendant: David Shinn, Core Civic, Bruno Stolc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Cruz v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00480
Plaintiff: David De La Cruz
Defendant: David Shinn, CoreCivic, Bruno Stolc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martineau v. Stolc et al
as 2:2023cv00376
Petitioner: Rockney Willard Martineau
Respondent: Bruno Stolc and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martineau v. Stolc et al
as 2:2022cv01897
Petitioner: Rockney Willard Martineau
Respondent: Bruno Stolc and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colonna v. CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00137
Plaintiff: Michael Colonna
Defendant: CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC, CoreCivic Incorporated, Bruno Stolc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Masterson v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01950
Plaintiff: Reno L Masterson
Defendant: Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, CoreCivic Incorporated, Bruno Stolc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardenas v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv01383
Petitioner: David Aldaba Cardenas
Respondent: United States of America and Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Outley v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00084
Defendant: T Degard, David Shinn, Greg Fizer and others
Plaintiff: Michael Dewayne Outley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?