Masterson v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
| Reno L Masterson |
| Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, CoreCivic Incorporated, Bruno Stolc and Matthew A Musson |
| 2:2021cv01950 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER - The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/30/2021. (WLP)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number PHX233304 filed by Reno L Masterson. (7 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
