Colonna v. CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC et al
| Michael Colonna |
| CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC, CoreCivic Incorporated, Bruno Stolc, Brittany Amaro, Brittany Greggs and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2022cv00137 |
| January 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Michelle H Burns |
| G Murray Snow |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Brittany Amaro, CoreCivic Incorporated, CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC, Brittany Greggs, Bruno Stolc. (Attachments: #1 Summons CoreCivic Tennessee, #2 Summons CoreCivic Inc., #3 Summons Greggs, #4 Summons Stolc) (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 8
ORDER: The February 9, 2022 Order to Show Cause #4 is discharged. Count Three of the First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Unknown Agents/Employees of CoreCivic and the official capacity claims against Defendants Stolc, Amaro, and Greggs are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants CoreCivic and Stolc, Amaro, and Greggs, in their individual capacities, must answer Counts One and Two of the First Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and First Amended Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). This matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If properly completed, the Clerk of Court must issue the proposed Summonses filed at Doc. #2 . Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/15/2022. (REK)
|
| Filing 7 *RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #4 Order to Show Cause filed by Plaintiff Michael Colonna. (Hamel, Edward) *Modified on 3/11/2022 (SMH). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Michael Colonna . (Attachments: #1 Amended Pleading)(Hamel, Edward) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael Colonna.(Hamel, Edward) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, why this case should not be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff's written response shall be limited to this issue only. If Plaintiff fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 2/9/22. (SST)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (JAM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Michael Colonna. (Hamel, Edward) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(JAM) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 0970-20273822 filed by Michael Colonna. (Hamel, Edward) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
