Ward v. Shinn et al
| Dwain A Ward, Jr. |
| David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan, Unknown Valdez, Adam Young, Alejandro Sanchez, Unknown Medley, Unknown Bainheart, Unknown Hoyos, Unknown Koepple, Unknown Condrey, Ruben Perez, Unknown Thorne, Lyle Freeland, Unknown Party, Spencer Sego, M Diaz, Julie Jones, Unknown Glynn and M Stephen |
| 2:2023cv00284 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Dwain A Ward, Jr. (8 pages)(KJ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #2 Complaint by Dwain A Ward, Jr. (1 page) (KJ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #2 Complaint by Dwain A Ward, Jr. (1 page) (KJ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Dwain A Ward, Jr. (1 Page) (REK) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dwain A Ward, Jr. (2 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Dwain A Ward, Jr. (147 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Envelope)(REK) |
Filing 1
ORDER: This case is severed into individual actions, one for each named Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court must file a copy of this Order in each new case. The rulings in this Order shall apply to each new case. The Clerk of Court must file a copy of: Plaintiff Mitchell's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in Mitchell's new individual case; Plaintiff Jordan's Application to Proceed in Jordan's new case; Plaintiff Tapia's Application to Proceed in Tapia's new case; Plaintiff Lincoln's Application to Proceed in Lincoln's new individual case; and Plaintiff Ward's Application to Proceed in Ward's new individual case. The individual Plaintiffs must proceed independently from this point and will not be regarded as co-plaintiffs, except upon further order of the Court. All further pleadings, motions or other papers submitted for filing by an individual Plaintiff in his or her separate case must be signed by the individual Plaintiff, or they will be stricken. The Clerk of Court must file a copy of the Complaint and this Order in each new case. The rulings in this Order shall apply in each new case. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Each Plaintiff has 30 days to file an amended complaint in his individual case, asserting only his claims using the court-approved form complaint for use by prisoners and in compliance with the Instructions. If a Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint in his individual case within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of that action without prejudice, and without further notice to the Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to use the addresses reflected on Plaintiffs Jordan, Tapia, Lincoln, and Ward as the mailing addresses of these Plaintiffs when mailing a copy of this Order and the case-opening paperwork in the new actions. The Clerk of Court must mail a copy of the Complaint to each individual Plaintiff. See document for further details. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 2/13/2023. (REK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
