Cases 1 - 10 of 25
K. G., et al v. Owl City, et al
as 24-1175
Plaintiff:
K. G. and B. G.
Defendant:
OWL CITY, ADAM YOUNG, DANIEL JORGENSEN and others
Kirby #165484 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirby
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, NaphCare, Ashley Pelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eggers #198846 v. Monaghan et al
as 2:2023cv01571
Plaintiff:
Zachary Eggers
Defendant:
Brendan M Monaghan, Kevin G Mendoza, Staci L Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youngs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06431
Plaintiff:
Adam Youngs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ward v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Dwain A Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arvizo #069485 v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Larry Arvizo
Defendant:
Adam Young and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Imiracle (HK) Limited v. Smoke 1 Tobacco and Vape LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Imiracle (HK) Limited
Defendant:
Smoke 1 Tobacco and Vape LLC doing business as Smoke 1 Tobacco and Vape and Adam Young
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Young et al v. Buckley et al
as 2:2021cv00287
Defendant:
Tyrone Buckley and Cassandra Jones
Plaintiff:
Adam Young and Tiffany Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85010
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
