Yokois v. Thornell et al
| Douglas D Yokois |
| Ryan Thornell, Larry Gann, Staci Ibarra, Bobby Kirkham, Joseph Anderson, Centurion Healthcare Consulting, Angel Merriman, Natalia Ivanovna Weigel, Stephen Graham, Unknown Party and NaphCare Incorporated |
| 2:2023cv00619 |
| April 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER - The Order to Show Cause (Doc. #3 ) is discharged. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 6/7/23. (DXD)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Submitted by Douglas D Yokois. (Attachments: #1 Summons summons submitted)(Scheff, Stacy) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #3 Order to Show Cause, by Plaintiff Douglas D Yokois. (Scheff, Stacy) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff must show cause, in writing, within 14 days, why his claims should not be dismissed insofar as they are premised on conduct that allegedly occurred before April 12, 2021. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/27/23. (DXD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MYE) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21802927 filed by Douglas D Yokois. (Scheff, Stacy) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
