Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Anderson v. Peppley, et al.
as 26-4758
Plaintiff:
DEVON JOSEPH ANDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTINE MARIE PEPPLEY, ELIZABETH BRAVENDER and ANGELA LEE PROULX
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv02994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12720
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andersen v. Beavers et al
as 2:2026cv00999
Plaintiff:
Jon Andersen
Defendant:
Sean Beavers, Brad Hassert, Stephanie Belanger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry et al v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2026cv08065
Plaintiff:
Nathan Maurice Henry
Defendant:
Gabriel Ruiz, Joseph Anderson, Dennis Milius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00496
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Anderson et al v. Derrick
as 1:2026cv00154
Plaintiff:
Devon Joseph Anderson and Christine Marie Peppley
Defendant:
Bree E Derrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nathan-Maurice v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2026cv08034
Plaintiff:
Henry Nathan-Maurice
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Prescott, City of, Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Joseph v. Recovery Solutions et al
as 2:2026cv14043
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anderson
Defendant:
Recovery Solutions, Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center, Department of Children and Families and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
