Thomas et al v. Luth et al
Plaintiff: Prentice Ray Thomas and Edith Bundy
Defendant: Darrell Luth and Didn't Do It Bail Bonds
Case Number: 2:2023cv01405
Filed: July 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle (PS)
Referring Judge: Michael T Liburdi
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2023 Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Prentice Ray Thomas. (1 Page) (REK)
August 7, 2023 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Prentice Ray Thomas. (3 Pages) (REK)
July 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff Bundy is dismissed without prejudice to filing a new case and either paying the filing and administrative fee or filing an Application to Proceed In District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff Thomas must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement (or institutional equivalent). If Plaintiff Thomas fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. See document for further details. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 7/23/2023. (REK)
July 19, 2023 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Prentice Ray Thomas. (1 Page) (REK)
July 19, 2023 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Prentice Ray Thomas. (3 Pages) (REK)
July 17, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK)
July 17, 2023 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Edith Bundy, Prentice Ray Thomas. (6 Pages and Envelope) (Please Note: Prentice Ray Thomas and Edith Bundy listed as Plaintiffs, but document signed by Prentice Ray Thomas only. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas et al v. Luth et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prentice Ray Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edith Bundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darrell Luth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Didn't Do It Bail Bonds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?