Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas et al v. Luth et al
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas and Edith Bundy
Defendant:
Darrell Luth and Didn't Do It Bail Bonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Thomas v. Community Regional Medical Center
as 1:2023cv00637
Petitioner:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Community Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Thomas v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, State of California, Wasco State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Thomas v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom and State of California
Defendant:
Scott Degough and Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Thomas v. Haros, et al.
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Defendant:
Paul Haros and Fresno County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Okwanoko et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Defendant:
Christiana Okwanoko, Wellpath to Hope and Healing, H. Cha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Defendant:
B. Weaver, Justin Garcia, Adriana Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prentice Ray Thomas v. Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 2:2019cv04906
Respondent:
Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office and Santa Barbara District Attorneys Office
Petitioner:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 1:2019cv00751
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Defendant:
Santa Barbara District Attorney's Office and Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
