Carrillo v. Progressive Insurance Company et al
| Judy Carrillo |
| Progressive Insurance Company, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Tempe Police Department, All City Towing, Douglas Loefgren, Wuertz Farm, Community Bridges Incorporated, Arizona Department of Transportation, Chris Fox, Joe Villa, Google Incorporated, United States Postal Service, Chandler Police Department and Allstate Insurance |
| 2:2024cv00771 |
| April 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (HLA) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Stephen M McNamee. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-24-771-PHX-SMM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (HLA) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Judy Carrillo. (HLA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Judy Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
