Cases 1 - 10 of 6,448
Teague v. Kentucky State Police Post 16 et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Sarah Teague
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police Post 16 and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Stakem et al
as 1:2024cv06291
Plaintiff:
Donald Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark D. Stakem and The Illinois Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Radar Online LLC v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 24-1964
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff:
RADAR ONLINE LLC and JAMES ROBERTSON
Clever Mcclatchey, IV v. FBI
as 24-2253
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff:
CLEVER MCCLATCHEY, IV
IN RE SUBPOENA ISSUED TO FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024mc00091
Unknown:
SUBPOENA ISSUED TO FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Petitioner:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
Clark v. Dixon et al
as 6:2024cv01342
Defendant:
Michigan State Police, Office of Inspector General, Carey Wilhelm Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Abraham Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 8:2024cv01720
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Bolton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bailey v. National Security Agency, et al.
as 24-4396
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, through Joseph R. Biden, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, through Lloyd J. Austin, III and others
Petitioner:
EARLEAN BAILEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
